ChatGPT said last week that it is going to compete with Google in the online search market. ChatGPT is establishing itself as a rival to established search engines like Google using OpenAI’s new real-time search function. SearchGPT, renowned for its conversational answers, delivers real-time contextual information without displaying advertisements, unlike Google Search, which often incorporates Google Ads in its results.
What Are The Main Differences Between SearchGPT & Google Search?
We seized the opportunity to compare SearchGPT against Google’s extensive search knowledge. We compared ChatGPT’s new functionality SearchGPT with Google search in several ways, looking at things like speed, accuracy, graphics, and overall user experience. This is their performance.
1. Speed and Reaction Time of SearchGPT vs Google search
Google: Google’s search engine is very fast, returning results in milliseconds. The search engine has years of optimization behind it, along with an infrastructure designed for high-speed indexing and retrieval, along with context-relevant pictures and connections. We had immediate access to a large number of relevant results from many sources thanks to this prompt and others.
SearchGPT: SearchGPT produced photographs and information for each place in a much clearer, more user-friendly manner, and its search was just as quick. It was clear that the AI produced the response by incorporating information from pertinent sources and then presenting it in a conversational manner.
The outcomes seemed more approachable as if the AI was eager for me to go.
Winner: ChatGPT Search wins for providing a useful, prompt answer in a conversational yet succinct manner.
2. Accuracy and information quality
Google: Gemini’s answer to Google included a brief statement summarizing everything. We could browse through a few links from Quora and other famous websites by scrolling down. Although it is evident that the algorithm favours well-known and reliable sources, it is also commercial-driven, so sponsored material, sometimes appears in the top results.
Furthermore, We had to go through many pages to put up a complete response when dealing with complicated subjects.
SearchGPT: It offers a straightforward response by obtaining validated data from the internet and including a clickable “Sources” button. This option reduces the amount of time We would have to spend using Google to get information from various websites. ChatGPT’s summaries for both basic and more in-depth subjects were spot-on with this search and others, and its layout makes for a more organized, targeted experience. (Remember, however, that advertisements may appear in the future.)
Winner: ChatGPT Search prevails in this round because of its accurate and easy straight responses.
3. Updates in real time
Google: We did not get a response right away from Google. Rather, We received a link, where We could explore and maybe discover the solution on our own.
SearchGPT: The response appeared before me in a matter of milliseconds. We also received news and updates from reliable sources, of course. It is quite refreshing to use SearchGPT. We are receiving responses to my inquiries without having to look up specifics. By having the solution in front of us without requiring us to click a couple more times, We are saving time.
Despite Google’s extensive visual database, it is evident that SearchGPT provides equivalent accuracy and even more detail for real-time market or weather information.
Winner: With its well-chosen, real-time direct responses, GPT keeps impressing and shows potential for further enhancements.
4. Responsibility for content and privacy
Google: There are so many answers available on Google that we are not even sure where to start. We Had never noticed this before using GPT Search, but the whole experience is really busy, from the Gemini answer to the sidebar to the link results below.
Additionally, Google’s advertising strategy often uses user data to provide tailored advertisements. Despite having many privacy options and restrictions, Google’s ad-driven strategy may result in targeted content that does not always put user privacy first.
SearchGPT: Whoa. Once again, SearchGPT offers a more streamlined interface devoid of sponsored material. The additional privacy-focused approach is really welcomed for searches this intimate.
As a user seeking information without being targeted by advertisements either during or after the search, we find it far more enticing.
Winner: Search GPT sets the standard for a strategy that considers both privacy and ethical content use. Being ad-free is a significant plus when it comes to sensitive searches.
5. Overall accessibility and user experience
Google: Google, We said what We said. Google corrected me for entering “What’s” instead of “What is” and then gave me a couple of paid links to click on. We feel like we need to ask it again to help narrow it down after receiving this answer.
SearchGPT: GPT Search provided me with the answer we were looking for, featured graphics, and filtered it down. The AI really seems like a buddy sharing useful knowledge.
Compared to Google, the design is considerably clearer and more succinct. Additionally, the conversational approach is user-friendly, allowing me to browse the suggestions without having to click on several links, as would be required when doing a Google search.
Winner: SearchGPT provides a novel experience with straightforward responses and concrete examples.
6. Real-time news reports
Google: News reports regarding the election were among the results from Google. With this inquiry, we hoped to receive straightforward, up-to-date information regarding who is now leading the presidential election polls. To get the solution, we would have needed to go through the news articles.
SearchGPT: Using just the facts, ChatGPT Search provided us with the results we wanted. We didn’t need to read any more news articles since the election news is all over the place. We received an immediate response from GPT.
Winner: SearchGPT provides hassle-free real-time responses.
7. Updates and news on sports
Google: Google’s first result was a statement taken from a report about the subject in the New York Times. This was a prompt and straightforward response. However, it made us feel as like we were missing some important details.
SearchGPT: Although ChatGPT Search provided a more comprehensive result with data gathered from more sources, it still seemed clear and succinct. We saw the whole extent of the Yanks’ catastrophic collapse.
Winner: SearchGPT once again provides the completeness that ensures we are obtaining all the information we need in addition to the real-time responses we want.
Winner Overall: SearchGPT vs Google Search
Although they serve somewhat distinct purposes, SearchGPT and Google are both excellent in separate domains. Google is the industry leader if you are searching for thorough results with a wide range of sources and images.
However, SearchGPT provides a simplified, user-friendly experience that might quickly become a standard for routine inquiries if you value clear, ad-free, conversational replies with integrated real-time updates. The clear, concise responses from SearchGPT Search, supported by references, are comprehensive and trustworthy. Because SeaechGPT’s responses are so succinct and devoid of advertisements, we have more faith in them.
We get the impression that the findings are exclusive to us. We enjoy how SearchGPT seems like a helpful buddy on a busy web.
But There’s A Cliche!
One advantage of Google search is that it can display useful components like maps, weather charts, and more because of its extensive product range, lengthy history, and strong connections and partnerships.
SearchGPT could want to develop that over time. Additionally, many companies continue to get impressions and hits from Google Ads.
Are SEO Services Providing Agencies Still in Business?
AI crawlers must explore, identify, and access information similarly to conventional search engine crawlers, the fundamentals of SEO—especially technical SEO—will always be important.
We think it is time to change the language we use in SEO, moving the focus from ranking to referencing and redefining what constitutes an SEO campaign’s overall success.
Finally, Digital Ad Experts begin to include upper-funnel visibility and touchpoints in our metrics, which go beyond bottom-of-the-funnel conversions.
